IS HOMOSEXUALITY A VALID SEXUAL IDENTITY Research Paper

IS homoeroticism A VALID SEXUAL IDENTITY - Research Paper ExampleThis paper will look for one of the main issues that reside in ethics, that is, whether homo cozyity is immoral, and if it ought to be considered as a sound sexual identity. The author of this paper will argue that gayness should be accepted as a valid sexual identity because none of the arguments presented against quirkiness are valid. This paper will primarily deal with the temperament and harm argument as presented by John Corvino. After of which, the author sh tout ensemble then present her digest regarding the said issue at hand. For, upon proving that the arguments against quirkiness are by far, invalid, the author have as hygienic shown both the importance of moral reasoning, and more importantly, that there exists no reasonable ground to deem homosexuality as something out rightly immoral. The Nature and Harm Argument At this day and age, homosexuality is unavoidably growing in all parts of the globe. A nd along with this is the growing number of differing opinions about the said matter. This function shall address the associated harm and unnaturalness charge that the opponents of homosexuality advocate. For, it is for this reason that homosexuality is deemed as something immoral. In what follows is an analysis of the alleged(prenominal) nature and harm argument presented by John Corvino, in his defense of homosexuality. M both who object to homosexuality argue that it is unnatural and wherefore immoral (Vaughn 231). ... The idea that animals could provide us with a sexual mensuration is simply amusing. And even if it were possible, it would not prove that homosexuality is immoral 3. The underlying estimation here is that all innate desires are good ones and should therefore be acted upon. However, regardless of something being innate or not, it doesnt follow that one should or should not act upon them. Likewise, determining the origin of the respective feeling or desire will n ot determine whether it is moral or immoral to act upon them 4. Since people goat and do use their sexual organs to procreate, it does not follow that they should not use them for other pop the questions. And minded(p) that homosexual intercourse utilizes sexual organs for other purposes aside from procreation, it does not follow that their act of fulfilling that purpose is immoral. 5. When some act is disgusting, it does not mean that it is wrong and thus, immoral. Therefore, the charge against homosexuality as something unnatural is, fit in to Corvino, longer on rhetorical flourish than on philosophical cogency. Upon analyzing the flow of the argument from nature, it seems that the underlying thought of the entire argument rests upon a false assumption, i.e. that any act, which is not in accordance to nature is therefore immoral. And despite the fact that there could be no logical connection between the unnaturalness and immorality of any given act, Corvinos line of defense do es not give any justice to the status of homosexuality as that which does not contribute any immoral consequences. In other words, he merely argues against the argument of homosexuality as something unnatural, but does not provide another argument or alternative that shows philosophical cogency. It