Intellectual property Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 1

Intellectual property - Assignment ExamplePast rulings by the CJEU and The High Court of England and Wales, leave be useful in analyzing the soundness of this injunction. According to the EUs E-commerce Directive, there is need for a balance to be struck in order to create a system that exempts intermediaries such as the information society service supplier who function as conduits of information and do not concern in monitoring or editing of content1. In the case project, balance is not struck. The Directive understandably states that an intermediary that expeditiously removes access to illegal content once they have received notice of the attack provide not be held presumable. Additionally, Article 12.1 of the Directive states that a service provider cannot be held liable for content transmitted through its network if the provider does not start the transmission, does not choose the recipient role of the content, and does not alter the content. The above injunction against t he Information Society Services Provider is blanket in nature, which deviates from the E-commerce detective.The E- Commerce Directive rules out the creation of monitoring pledges for intermediaries. According to article 15, limitation of liability should not be interpreted as giving any obligation. In the above case, the injunction is giving an obligation to the provider. This implies that providers of online material will not be liable for illegal material that has been availed in their networks by its clients if the provider is a mere channel and has processes in place to take out the material quickly and they will not be required to supervise activity in advance2. This principle of limitation of liability for net service providers is applicable in many jurisdictions. Despite the present legislation, the debate concerning intermediary liability continues with patience and regulators raising the issue of liability.In analyzing this